Inclusion and Kant: Are We Treating Clients as Ends or Means?
When we talk about inclusion, we often talk about policy, access, enrollment, and services. But there is a deeper question beneath all of that: Are we treating children receiving therapies as ends in themselves or as means to something else? The philosopher Immanuel Kant gave us a moral principle that still challenges institutions today. He argued that human beings must never be treated merely as a means to an end. In simple language: people must not be used. Not for profit. Not for reputation. Not for convenience. Not for performance. They must be respected for who they are. What Does This Look Like in Practice? Let’s bring this into the world of therapy and inclusion. A child enrolls for speech therapy, occupational therapy, behavioural support, or learning intervention. The centre says: “We are inclusive.” “We provide specialized services.” “We care deeply about progress.” But we must ask: Are therapy plans designed around the child’s real needs? Or around what the centre can manage...